| 0-3 marks |
4-7 marks |
8-10 marks |
Conclusions are weak or missing with little or
no justification.
Information may be ambiguous or disorganised.
There is limited if any reference to evidence. |
The material has structure and coherence with
justifiable conclusions being reached although there may be some
omissions.
|
Thorough and convincing conclusions have been
reached, which are borne out by the research carried out by the
candidate.
This material has been presented in a clear and relevant way
which is simple to navigate.
|
| The solution is presented with little, if any, evidence of
testing. |
There is evidence that the solutions have been tested for basic
functionality. |
The solutions are fully tested and there is little doubt that
the solutions presented are fully functional. |
| The evidence of written communication is limited with little or
no use of specialist terms. |
Specialist terms will be used appropriately and for the most
part correctly.
Evidence of good written communication using some specialist
terms. |
A high level of written communication is obvious throughout the
task and specialist terms/technology with accurate use of
spelling is used. |
| There are many errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar. |
There are few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. |
Grammar and punctuation is consistently correct. |
| The evaluation may be simplistic with little or no relevance. |
Candidates will have produced a sound evaluation which reviews
some aspects of the task. |
The evaluation will be relevant, clear, organised and presented
in a structured and coherent format. |